by Aldous Huxley,1894-1963
This is the story about a future world which is controlled completely by a totalitarian government for the purpose of stability. To achieve this aim the government controls every aspect of life, including generativity, recreation, indoctrination and emotion. The interaction of the characters in the plot is used to raise many philosophical and prophetic questions.
Brief Outline
i. At the Cathedral/Cabaret
ii. At the Solidarity Service
i.
Linda on Permanent Soma
ii.
The
iii. Bernard’s Rise in Status
Summary
Brave New World introduces
us to a dystopia in which every facet of life, indeed even the generation of
life itself, is completely controlled by an apparently benign totalitarian
regime for the sake of stability. The
motto of this
There are no real heroes in this world in which nature is replaced with technology. Bernard Marx, an “alpha” – the highest caste – is deeply unhappy with his loss of individuality yet, ironically, he seeks individuality only because he is forced into it due to physical defects (a factory processing error). Bernard’s friend Helmholtz Watson also suffered a conditioning error – too much intelligence. But when given an opportunity to finally express his poetic urge to its fullest by means of an introduction to an illegal copy of Shakespeare, in the end he cannot overcome his conditioned responses. John the Savage, born naturally, comes closest to being a hero but fails in three important areas:
- He too cannot seem to overcome the adversarial aspects of his childhood which conditioned him, this despite being born naturally
-
His discovery and highly unlikely grasp of Shakespearean
literature provides an ineffective philosophical foundation for a refutation of
the
- His own lack of maturity and authentic spirituality prevents him from restraining his excessive asceticism which ultimately results in his complete moral collapse, despair and suicide
To briefly summarize the plot: Bernard and Lenina go to a
reservation of native people where they encounter John, a natural born man who happens
to be the son of the Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning. Bernard, realizing what an incredible scandal
this is, takes John and his mother Linda back to
I enjoyed Brave New World very much, though more as a philosophical work than anything else. The questions I found myself continually asking were:
-
Were the means by which the
- Where in our society today do we find that this work from 1932 was prophetic? Certainly today suffering of any sort, including emotional, is seen as a great evil which only the demented would not “fix” immediately with a pill or distraction. And who would refute that consumption is encouraged, though less by governments and more by multinational corporations who have only one interest in mind. It doesn’t take much reflection to arrive at a list of some of the ways these corporations reach us and convince us of the necessity of their products: television, radio, newspapers, magazines, clothes, sponsorships, sports, fashions, the internet, recreations, marriage, child-rearing. Perhaps the most egregious and stunningly successful example is that of the DeBeers diamond cartel: “Marry her all over again.” In DeBeers we witness the corporate hijacking of the institution of marriage to create consumption and profit. They have literally created the cultural tradition of giving diamonds for engagements, anniversaries and marriages. DeBeers’ success can readily be seen by the number of those who have been conditioned to associate diamonds with human love.
I think Brave New World is a very effective novel because of the continuous stream of philosophical meanderings which it engenders in the astute reader’s mind. It is somewhat unsatisfying in that it lacks a hero. Indeed, in Huxley’s own forward to the book which he wrote years later there is regret expressed that John was not offered a third alternative: to return to the reservation. It is also unsatisfying that John, despite his deep immersion into Shakespeare, was completely unable to offer effective counterarguments to Mustapha Mond’s vision and philosophy – this despite that his visit to Mustapha was in itself proof of the brittleness of the society: with relative ease he was able to incite a riot, which is the very symbol of the lack of stability in a society. These are less shortcomings, however, than doorways through which the reader can enter Huxley’s world, engage it at a fundamental level and return back again, hopefully not unaffected by the prophetic warnings for his own Brave New World.