“Plus free housing. Plus a free cell phone, fully paid each month.” The gentleman I was speaking with was enumerating all the things which the Indians here receive. “People that don’t live here don’t understand. All they think is ‘the poor Indians, what we did to them.’ They don’t see the new government housing built for them. Then once they move in, they gut it and sell the furniture. The whole situation is just…I don’t know, it’s..” he struggled to describe it.
“Pathetic,” I said.
“Yeah, pathetic.”
Pathetic was the word I came up with when I spent two weeks touring Utah and talking to everyone I could about the state of Indians on the reservation. Not pitiable, not needing justice, none of that. Pathetic.
The definition in the little dictionary I currently have access to defines pathetic as “miserably inadequate.” I don’t think anyone who is aware of the situation would argue that it is not “miserably inadequate.” Such a definition avoids blame, avoids emotional pity, and even historical guilt. I think both sides would agree on that term.
The man I was speaking with continued. “The cell phone really gets me,” he said. “I give my Indian friend endless shit over that one. And a free $600 a month? How is that actually helping them? How does it help them to build free houses only to have them gut them? They have brand new cars and sleep in a slum.” I only nodded. I had seen plenty of that before. “People think I’m prejudice,” he said, shaking his head. “In fact, I adopted two Indian babies and raised them to 18 years of age. They changed, became different. The adage is true: you can take the Indian off the reservation but you can’t take the reservation out of the Indian. Call me prejudice, but who has raised two children for 18 years? I think I have an insight or two into the situation.”
* * *
“He said they gut the houses and sell the furniture,” I told the woman next to me at the bar the other evening. “Oh definitely,” she said. “And they rip off the front door and burn it. It’s just what they do, it’s what they’ve always done,” she stated matter-of-factly. She may have seen my eyebrows raise slightly, and so added: “And I know. I’m a schoolteacher here and I teach their children. They tell me all about it. And I don’t know why they give their children up for adoption.”
* * *
When traveling through southern Utah in 2003 I struck up frequent conversations with people about Indians, reservations, government welfare and the like. I vividly recall one conversation with a hotel manager. After she checked me in we both sat outside in the clear night air on a bench by the front door. “The younger kids want to fit in, the adults refuse,” she began. “I see their kids come into the schools, or when playing with my kids. They are often beaten. The phrase we use here for that is ‘beating the white out of them.’ Their parents hate that they are integrating into white culture, so they repay them with beatings.”
Then, as now, the ones who speak in terms of pity, of what the United States government did to them and what they deserve back, are tourists. Tourists, or people who have not bothered to seek out alternative viewpoints than the ones Hollywood has given them by means of melodramatic movies.
* * *
Recommended Books: “In the Spirit of Crazy Horse.”
That is the name of one of several highly controversial books written on a small card on one of the shelves of the “Indian and U.S. Government Affairs” section of the bookstore in Prairie’s Edge, in downtown Rapid City. It is wildly popular, because it pulls at the heartstrings of mainstream America’s obsession with guilt over Native Americans. The book is sympathetic to Leonard Peltier, an Indian activist who is currently serving two life sentences for murdering two FBI agents in cold blood. It occurred during the incident in 1973 of Wounded Knee, a town not far south of here, on the Pine Ridge reservation. In trying to sort out fact from fiction, one is reminded of other incidents such as Waco, where it seems truth depends upon if you are an activist or a government sympathizer.
Another recommended title is “Pagans in the Promised Land.” It is a book which asserts that the U.S. government is still operating on an Indian conquest mentality it received from Christianity. I read through some sections of the book. It talked about the lack of separation of church and state in the U.S. and the conquering mentality that Christians have because of the mandate given them by God in the Old Testament [sic]. Scholarship was not given a priority.
Trying to muddle through all the opinions and polemics is distressing. What arises in the depths of my psyche whenever I try to understand all this is a gnawing suspicion that I am looking at a culture of great beauty and profound loss, but a culture which is trying to cling to a past it cannot have, prodded on relentlessly by a collective, insatiable guilt from those who keep a comfortable distance from the situation and learn about it through the lens of an ever eager Hollywood.